Rammed Aggregate Piers (RAP®) by Geopier® and conventional stone columns (SCs) are popular ground improvement techniques used in projects requiring soil stabilization. While both aim to reinforce and improve soil performance, there are key differences in their construction methods, performance, and design approach. Below are three main differences between these technologies.

This blog presents the historical context of liquefaction design methods and delves into the mechanics of mitigation. It is particularly relevant as it explores new approaches and design methods for treating difficult-to-improve silty soils and offers a fresh perspective on how to measure these mechanical improvements.

Building on soft soils, peat, or highly compressible clays represents one of the biggest challenges in modern geotechnical engineering. When structural loads are high, conventional solutions can prove costly, inefficient, or technically limited. In this context, rigid inclusions have emerged as a high-value alternative for ground improvement, enabling the foundation of complex structures.